Victorian Hairwork: Interview with Courtney Lane

Part of the pleasure of collecting curiosities lies in discovering the reactions they cause in various people: seeing the wonder arise on the face of onlookers always moves me, and gives meaning to the collection itself. Among the objects that, at least in my experience, evoke the strongest emotional response there are without doubt mourning-related accessories, and in particular those extraordinary XIX Century decorative works made by braiding a deceased person’s hair.

Be it a small brooch containing a simple lock of hair, a framed picture or a larger wreath, there is something powerful and touching in these hairworks, and the feeling they convey is surprisingly universal. You could say that anyone, regardless of their culture, experience or provenance, is “equipped” to recognize the archetypical value of hair: to use them in embroidery, jewelry and decoration is therefore an eminently magical act.

I decided to discuss this peculiar tradition with an expert, who was so kind as to answer my questions.
Courtney Lane is a real authority on the subject, not just its history but also its practical side: she studied the original techniques with the intent of bringing them back to life, as she is convinced that this ancient craft could accomplish its function of preserving memory still today.

Can you tell us a bit about yourself?

I am a Victorian hair artist, historian, and self-proclaimed professional weirdo based in Kansas City. My business is called Never Forgotten where, as an artist, I create modern works of Victorian style sentimental hairwork for clients on a custom basis as well as making my own pieces using braids and locks of antique human hair that I find in places such as estate sales at old homes. As an academic, I study the history of hairwork and educate others through lectures as well as online video, and I also travel to teach workshops on how to do hairwork techniques.

Hairwork by Courtney Lane.

Where does your interest for Victorian hairwork come from?

I’ve always had a deep love for history and finding beauty in places that many consider to be dark or macabre. At the young age of 5, I fell in love with the beauty of 18th and 19th century mausoleums in the cemeteries near the French Quarter of New Orleans. Even as a child, I adored the grand gesture of these elaborate tombs for memorializing the dead. This lead me to developing a particular fondness for the Victorian era and the funerary customs of the time.
Somewhere along the line in studying Victorian mourning, I encountered the idea of hairwork. A romantic at heart, I’d already known of the romantic value a lock of hair from your loved one could hold, so I very naturally accepted that it would also be a perfect relic to keep of a deceased loved one. I found the artwork to be stunning and the sentiment to be of even greater beauty. I wondered why it was that we no longer practiced hairwork widely, and I needed to know why.
I studied for years trying to find the answers and eventually I learned how to do the artwork myself. I thoroughly believed that the power of sentimental hairwork could help society reclaim a healthier relationship with death and mourning, and so I decided to begin my business to create modern works, educate the public on the often misunderstood history of the artform, and ensure that this sentimental tradition is “Never Forgotten”.

How did hairwork become a popular mourning practice historically? Was the hair collected before or post mortem? Was it always related to grieving?

Hairwork has taken on a variety of purposes, most of which have been inherently sentimental, but it has not always been related to grieving. With the death of her husband, Queen Victoria fell into a deep mourning which lasted the remaining 40 years of her life. This, in turn, created a certain fashionability, and almost a fetishism, of mourning in the Victorian era. Most people today believe all hairwork had the purpose of elaborating a loss, but between the 1500s and early 1900s, hairwork included romantic keepsakes from a loved one or family mementos, and sometimes served as memorabilia from an important time in one’s life. As an example, many of the large three-dimensional wreaths you can still see actually served as a form of family history. Hair was often collected from several (often living) members of the family and woven together to create a genealogy. I’ve seen other examples of hairwork simply commemorating a major life event such as a first communion or a wedding. Long before hairwork became an art form, humans had already been exchanging locks of hair; so it’s only natural that there were instances of couples wearing jewelry that contained the hair of their living lovers.

As far as mourning hairwork is concerned, the hair was sometimes collected post mortem, and sometimes the hair was saved from an earlier time in their life. As hair was such an important part of culture, it was often saved when it was cut whether or not there was an immediate plan for making art or jewelry with it.
The idea of using hair as a mourning practice largely stems from Catholicism in the Middle Ages and the power of saintly relics in the church. The relic of a saint is more than just the physical remains of their body, rather it provides a spiritual connection to the holy person, creating a link between life and death. This belief that a relic can be a substitute for the person easily transitioned from public, religious mourning to private, personal mourning.
Of the types of relics (bone, flesh, etc), hair is by far the most accessible to the average person, as it does not need any sort of preservation to avoid decomposition, much as the rest of the body does; collecting from the body is as simple as using a pair of scissors. Hair is also one of the most identifiable parts of person, so even though pieces of bone might just be as much of a relic, hair is part of your loved one that you see everyday in life, and can continue to recognize after death.

Was hairwork strictly a high-class practice?

Hairwork was not strictly high-class. Although hairwork was kept by some members of upper class, it was predominantly a middle-class practice. Some hairwork was done by professional hairworkers, and of course, anyone commissioning them would need the means to do so; but a lot of hairwork was done in the home usually by the women of the family. With this being the case, the only expenses would be the crafting tools (which many middle-class women would already likely have around the home), and the jewelry findings, frames, or domes to place the finished hairwork in.

How many people worked at a single wreath, and for how long? Was it a feminine occupation, like embroidery?

Hairwork was usually, but not exclusively done by women and was even considered a subgenre of ladies’ fancy work. Fancy work consisted of embroidery, beadwork, featherwork, and more. There are even instances of women using hair to embroider and sew. It was thought to be a very feminine trait to be able to patiently and meticulously craft something beautiful.
As far as wreaths are concerned, it varied in the number of people who would work together to create one. Only a few are well documented enough to know for sure.
I’ve also observed dozens of different techniques used to craft flowers in wreaths and some techniques are more time consuming than others. One of the best examples I’ve seen is an incredibly well documented piece that indicates that the whole wreath consists of 1000 flowers (larger than the average wreath) and was constructed entirely by one woman over the span of a year. The documentation also specifies that the 1000 flowers were made with the hair of 264 people.


Why did it fall out of fashion during the XX Century?

Hairwork started to decline in popularity in the early 1900’s. There were several reasons.
The first reason was the growth of hairwork as an industry. Several large companies and catalogues started advertising custom hairwork, and many people feared that sending out for the hairwork rather than making it in the home would take away from the sentiment. Among these companies was Sears, Roebuck and Company, and in one of their catalogues in 1908, they even warned, “We do not do this braiding ourselves. We send it out; therefore we cannot guarantee same hair being used that is sent to us; you must assume all risk.” This, of course, deterred people from using professional hairworkers.
Another reason lies with the development and acceptance of germ theory in the Victorian era. The more people learned about germs and the more sanitary products were being sold, the more people began to view the human body and all its parts as a filthy thing. Along with this came the thought that hair, too, was unclean and people began to second guess using it as a medium for art and jewelry.
World War I also had a lot to do with the decline of hairwork. Not only was there a general depletion in resources for involved countries, but more and more women began to work outside of the home and no longer had the time to create fancy work daily. During war time when everybody was coming together to help the war effort, citizens began to turn away from frivolous expenses and focus only on necessities. Hair at this time was seen for the practical purposes it could serve. For example, in Germany there were propaganda posters encouraging women to cut their long hair and donate it to the war effort when other fibrous materials became scarce. The hair that women donated was used to make practical items such as transmission belts.
With all of these reasons working together, sentimental hairwork was almost completely out of practice by the year 1925; no major companies continued to create or repair hairwork, and making hairwork at home was no longer a regular part of daily life for women.

19th century hairworks have become trendy collectors items; this is due in part to a fascination with Victorian mourning practices, but it also seems to me that these pieces hold a special value, as opposed to other items like regular brooches or jewelry, because of – well, the presence of human hair. Do you think we might still be attaching some kind of “magical”, symbolic power to hair? Or is it just an expression of morbid curiosity for human remains, albeit in a mild and not-so-shocking form?

I absolutely believe that all of these are true. Especially amongst people less familiar with these practices, there is a real shock value to seeing something made out of hair. When I first introduce the concept of hairwork to people, some find the idea to be disgusting, but most are just fascinated that the hair does not decompose. People today are so out of touch with death, that they immediately equate hair as a part of the body and don’t understand how it can still be perfectly pristine over a hundred years later. For those who don’t often ponder their own mortality, thinking about the fact that hair can physically live on long after they’ve died can be a completely staggering realization.
Once the initial surprise and morbid curiosity have faded, many people recognize a special value in the hair itself. Amongst serious collectors of hair, there seems to be a touching sense of fulfillment in the opportunity to preserve the memory of somebody who once was loved enough to be memorialized this way – even if they remain nameless today. Some may say it is a spiritual calling, but I would say at the very least it is a shared sense of mortal empathy.

What kind of research did you have to do in order to learn the basics of Victorian hairworks? After all, this could be described as a kind of “folk art”, which was meant for a specific, often personal purpose; so were there any books at the time holding detailed instructions on how to do it? Or did you have to study original hairworks to understand how it was done?

Learning hairwork was a journey for me. First, I should say that there are several different types of hairwork and some techniques are better documented than others. Wire work is the type of hairwork you see in wreaths and other three-dimensional flowers. I was not able to find any good resources on how to do these techniques, so in order to learn, I began by studying countless wreaths. I took every opportunity I could to study wreaths that were out of their frame or damaged so I could try to put them back together and see how everything connected. I spent hours staring at old pieces and playing with practice hair through trial and error.
Other techniques are palette work and table work. Palette work includes flat pictures of hair which you may see in a frame or under glass in jewelry, and table work includes the elaborate braids that make up a jewelry chain such as a necklace or a watch fob.
The Lock of Hair
by Alexanna Speight and Art of Hair Work: Hair Braiding and Jewelry of Sentiment by Mark Campbell teach palette work and table work, respectively. Unfortunately, being so old, these books use archaic English and also reference tools and materials that are no longer made or not as easy to come by. Even after reading these books, it takes quite a bit of time to find modern equivalents and practice with a few substitutions to find the best alternative. For these reasons, I would love to write an instructional book explaining all three of these core techniques in an easy to understand way using modern materials, so hairwork as a craft can be more accessible to a wider audience.

Why do you think this technique could be still relevant today?

The act and tradition of saving hair is still present in our society. Parents often save a lock of their child’s first haircut, but unfortunately that lock of hair will stay hidden away in an envelope or a book and rarely seen again. I’ve also gained several clients just from meeting someone who has never heard of hairwork, but they still felt compelled cut a lock of hair from their deceased loved one to keep. Their eyes consistently light up when they learn that they can wear it in jewelry or display it in artwork. Time and again, these people ask me if it’s weird that they saved this hair. Often, they don’t even know why they did. It’s a compulsion that many of us feel, but we don’t talk about it or celebrate it in our modern culture, so they think they’re strange or morbid even though it’s an incredibly natural thing to do.
Another example is saving your own hair when it’s cut. Especially in instances of cutting hair that’s been grown very long or hair that has been locked, I very often encounter people who have felt so much of a personal investment in their own hair that they don’t feel right throwing it out. These individuals may keep their hair in a bag for years, not knowing what to do with it, only knowing that it felt right to keep. This makes perfect sense to me, because hair throughout history has always been a very personal thing. Even today, people identify each other by hair whether it be length, texture, color, or style. Different cultures may wear their hair in a certain way to convey something about their heritage, or individuals will use their own creativity or sense of self to decide how to wear their hair. Whether it be for religion, culture, romance, or mourning, the desire to attach sentimental value to hair and the impulse to keep the hair of your loved one are inherently human.
I truly believe that being able to proudly display our hair relics can help us process some of our most intimate emotions and live our best lives.

You can visit Courtney Lane’s website Never Forgotten, and follow her on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube. If you’re interested in the symbolic and magical value of human hair, here is my post on the subject.

14 comments to Victorian Hairwork: Interview with Courtney Lane

  1. Chiara says:

    Intervista stupenda. Grazie per aver introdotto Courtney, che non conoscevo e che è stata una scoperta veramente gradita. Inutile dire che trovo le sue opere meravigliose e dal significato dolcissimo. Portare con sé un ricordo dei propri cari tangibile e concreto come una ciocca di capelli, o un ciuffetto di pelliccia nel caso di un animale, rimanda come non mai a quella che è stata la vera vita di chi ci manca, senza farci cadere alla tentazione di idealizzare chi non c’è più. E’ questo che rende queste opere ancora più belle e significative.

    • bizzarrobazar says:

      L’hai espresso perfettamente Chiara: si tratta di un piccolo ricordo della persona che viene valorizzato e inserito in una dimensione estetica, eppure mantiene una concretezza tattile, tridimensionale, tangibile, che manca per esempio a una fotografia.

  2. Gigi M. says:

    Molto interessante.
    Mi torna in mente un romanzo che lessi anni fa di Andreas Eschbach intitolato “Miliardi di tappeti di capelli”, in cui però sono gli uomini a tessere un tappeto usando i capelli delle donne.
    Anche se, in quel caso, lo scopo era farne dono all’imperatore dell’universo.

  3. gery says:

    Mai avrei pensato che dei capelli umani potessero diventare delle bellissime decorazioni. Un ultimo gesto d’affetto, per ricordare (o indossare) la persona che non c’è più.

  4. Alice says:

    Ciao Ivan e Bizzarro Bazar, buon anno, innanzitutto.
    Sono rimasta indietro di diversi articoli e ho fatto davvero tardi per leggerli, ma ne è valsa la pena.
    Questo articolo per me è davvero toccante, proprio nel senso che mi tocca anche personalmente.
    Confermo, che almeno per quanto riguarda la mia esperienza personale, i capelli sono tutt’oggi qualcosa di significativo.
    Da piccola, intorno ai 5 anni, ho avuto una forma acuta di una grave malattia di origine infettiva -non sto a dire cosa- e sono finita anche in coma. Sono stata curata con molta competenza e tenacia, ma ero data per spacciata data la gravità della fulminante malattia.
    Avevo capelli straordinariamente lunghi e folti per quell’età, molto belli, e mia nonna in quell’occasione tagliò la mia magnifica treccia.
    Non so per quale motivo (come ricordo, se fossi morta? Per farmi stare più “libera”, senza l’ingombro dell’abbondante chioma? Non so), io ero incosciente, non mi sono accorta di nulla e in seguito non ho mai chiesto.
    Per inciso, sono uscita dal coma e anche indenne dalla malattia: non ho riportato conseguenza alcuna, nonostante sia stata così vicina a morire, eccetto forse che ancora ho un vivido ricordo del dolore, di quanto mi sentivo male male male prima di cadere in coma.
    A tutt’oggi, in un sacchetto di velluto nero, c’è la mia treccia, che conservo io stessa da anni, consegnatami senza molte parole dalla nonna quando ero adolescente.
    Me ne rammento di rado, della treccia: mi imbatto nel sacchetto di velluto nero quando cerco qualche cosa in un certo cassettone. E se qualche volta apro il sacchetto per vedere la treccia, è davvero ancora incredibilmente bella, di color biondo ramato, grossa e lucente, i capelli fini e morbidi, e, un po’ sconcertante, profumata! Non è stata irrorata di profumo alcuno, e nemmeno il sacchetto che la contiene… ha una fragranza che sprigiona di suo, sa di buono, ed è inconfondibile. Mi chiedo sempre come possano essere così puliti e freschi quei capelli, viste le circostanze in cui sono stati tagliati!

    Certo, questi ricami di capelli sono tutt’altra cosa, tanto lavoro, bellissimi. La mia treccia da moritura, inutile dirlo, mi fa comprendere profondamente questo attaccamento e questa dedizione.
    Sono quasi commossa.

    • bizzarrobazar says:

      Che bella storia, grazie per averla condivisa. Magari un giorno riuscirai a farne qualcosa, di quella treccia – anche solo incorniciarla! 😀
      PS. Sto traducendo il tuo commento e quelli degli altri per inviarli a Courtney, penso le faranno molto piacere.

      • Alice says:

        Certo perché no, e grazie a te.
        A chi fa un lavoro manuale di tal precisione e pazienza fa piacere vedere che il risultato è giustamente apprezzato. 🙂
        A proposito dei gioielli funebri, da tempo so che oggi vengono realizzate (e hanno mercato) gemme, specie diamanti (o meglio simil-diamanti), trasformando le ceneri e/o i capelli dei cari defunti per mezzo di processi chimico-fisici simili a quelli per realizzare le gemme false.
        In effetti con questo sembra sia confermato quanto detto nell’intervista: che oggi non mancherebbe chi desidera un ricordo tratto dal corpo del familiare defunto, ma sembra, a mio avviso, che ci sia una certa ‘vergogna’ nell’indossare apertamente resti organici come i capelli, mentre col processo che trasforma i resti in gemme forse i clienti più timorosi e imbarazzati scavalcano la remora di apparire ‘morbosi’, come dice anche Courtney, e indossano ceneri e capelli, ma completamente occultati e trasformati.
        A me la traduzione in finta gemma preziosa non piace affatto, e poi va perduto il legame con una tradizione artigianale-artistica molto antica, di cui fa parte anche il dono, tanto in uso in epoche passate, della famosa ciocca di capelli fra innamorati, quasi sempre lavorata e indossata in modo identico alle ciocche memento funebre!

  5. Lovisa says:

    Funny that she’d have to recreate hair work, when it is a living tradition in parts of the world. Some of the works here are quite simular to the works of Anna sparr, working in the Våmhus tradition of hårkullor.

  6. Efy says:

    Questo articolo è davvero da bazar del bizzarro!! ❤️

  7. cupmallows says:

    grazie per il meraviglioso articolo!!!

  8. Lucia says:

    Molto interessante grazie di averci illustrato questa analisi sulla conservazione dei capelli

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.