In this post I would like to address three different discoveries I made over the years, and their peculiar relationship.
∼ 2009 ∼
I had just started this blog. During my nightly researches, I remember being impressed by the work of an Italian photographer who specialized in still life pictures: Guido Mocafico.
I was particularly struck – for obvious reasons of personal taste – by his photographs inspired by Dutch vanitas paintings from the 16th and 17th centuries: the pictures showed an outstanding, refined use of light and composition (they almost looked like paintings), but that was not all there was.
In this superb series, Mocafico represented many classic motifs used to symbolize transience (the homo bulla, man being like a soap bubble, but also the hourglass, the burning candle, etc.) with irreproachable taste and philologic attention; the smallest details betrayed a rigorous and deep preparation, a meticulous study which underpinned each of his photographs.
I went on to archive these fascinating photographs, promising myself I would talk about them sooner or later. I never kept that promise, until now.
∼ 2017 ∼
Last year Taschen published a somptuous, giant-size edition of Ernst Haeckel‘s works.
The German scientist, who lived between late 19th century and early 20th century, was an exceptional figure: marine biologist, naturalist, philosopher, he was among the major popularizers of Darwin’s theory of evolution in Germany. He discovered and classified thousands of new species, but above all he depicted them in hundreds of colorful illustrations.
Taschen’s luxurious volume is a neverending wonder, page after page. An immersion into an unknown and alien world – our world, inhabited by microorganisms of breathtaking beauty, graceful jellyfish, living creatures of every shape and structure.
It is a double aesthetic experience: one one hand we are in awe at nature’s imaginative skills, on the other at the artist’s mastery.
I’ll confess that going through the book, I often willingly forget to check the taxonomic labels: after a while, human categories and names seem to lose their meaning, and it’s best to just get lost in sheer contemplation of those perfect, intricate, unusual, exuberant forms.
∼ 2018 ∼
London, Natural History Museum, a couple of weeks ago.
There I am, bewildered for half an hour, looking at the model of a radiolarian, a single-celled organism found in zooplankton. In the darkened room, the light coming from above emphasizes the model’s intricate craftsmanship. The level of detail, the fragility of its thin pseudopods and the rendering of the protozoa’s translucid texture are mind-blowing.
This object’s peculiarity is that it’s made of glass. It’s one of the models created by 19th-century master glassmakers Leopold and Rudolph Blaschka.
And this is just one among thousands and thousands of similar masterpieces created by the two artists from Dresden.
The Blaschkas were a Bohemian family of glass artisans, and when Leopold was born he inherited the genes of several generations of glassmakers. Being especially talented from an early age, he created decorations and glass eyes for many years, until in a short span of time he happened to lose his wife, his son and his father to cholera. Shattered by grief, he took sails towards America but the ship was stopped at sea for two week due to a lack of wind. During this forced arrest, in the darkest period of his life, Leopold was saved by wonder: one night he was looking at the dark ocean, when suddenly he noticed “a flashlike bundle of light beams, as if it is surrounded by thousands of sparks, that form true bundles of fire and of other bright lighting spots, and the seemingly mirrored stars”. He observed those sea creatures in awe, and took sketches of their structure. Since that night, the memory of the magical spectacle he had witnessed never left him.
Years later, back in Dresden and happily remarried, he began creating glass flowers, as a hobby; his orchids were so perfectly crafted that they caught the eye of prince Camille de Rohan first, and then of the director of the Natural History Museum. The latter commissioned twelve sea anemones models; and thus Leopold, remembering that night on the stranded ship, began to work on scientific models. Soon Blaschka’s sea animals – and glass flowers – became famous; Leopold, with the help of his son Rudolph, collaborated with all the most important museums. After his father’s death, Rudolph continued to work developing an even more refined technique, producing 4.400 plant models for Harvard University’s Herbarium.
Together, father and son crafted a total of around 10.000 glass models of sea creatures.
Their artistry attained such perfection that, after them, no glassmaker would ever be able replicate it. “Many people think – Leopold wrote in 1889 – that we have some secret apparatus by which we can squeeze glass suddenly into these forms, but it is not so. We have tact. My son Rudolf has more than I have, because he is my son, and tact increases in every generation”.
∼ Convergence ∼
Some of our interests, at first glance independent from one another, sometimes turn out to be actually correlated. It is as if, on the map of our own passions, we suddenly discover a secret passage between two areas that we thought were distinct, a “B” spot connecting points “A” and “C”.
In this case, for me the “A” point was Guido Mocafico, the author of the evocative series of photographs entitled Vanités; whom I discovered years ago, and guiltily forgotten.
Haeckel was, in retrospect, my “C” point.
And I never would have thought of linking one to the other, before a “B” point, Blaschka’s glass models, appeared on my mind map
Because, here is the thing: to build their incredible glass invertebrates, Leopold and his son Rudolph were inspired, among other things, by Haeckel’s illustrations.
And you can imagine my surprise when I found out that all the best photographs of the Blaschka models, those you can see in this very article, were taken by… Guido Mocafico.
Unbeknownst to me, during the years I had lost sight of him, the photographer dedicated some amazing series of pictures to the Blaschka models, as you can see on his official website.
I always felt there was a tight connection between Haeckel’s fantastic microorganisms and my beloved vanitas. Their intimate bond, perhaps, was sensed by Mocafico too, in his aesthetic research.
A wonder for the creatures of the world is also the astonishment in regard to their impermanence.
At heart, we – human beings, animals, plants, ecosystems, maybe even reality itself – are but immensely beautiful, yet very fragile, glass masterpieces.
Sinceramente. Sei inarrivabile! Immaginifico! Quando fai qualcosa a Genova?
Oh, sinceramente non saprei… Ma ho alcuni amici a Genova, che gestiscono anche un famoso speakeasy, magari si può organizzare qualcosina. Vedremo! 🙂
Che articolo fantastico! Come diciamo a Napoli “mi hai fatto consolare”! 🙂 Grazie mille per il lavoro di ricerca e di divulgazione che fai, leggerti e’ sempre un piacere immenso.
Grazie a te Daniela! ?
Non serve commentare l’impressionante delicatezza dei maestri Blaschka.
Bellissimo! Ho dato un occhio ai lavori in vetro dei maestri Blaschka e devo dire che sono stupendi! Però… però i loro lavori fotografati da un’altro fotografo rendono in un modo, ma le fotografie di Guido Mocafico, riescono a dare una marcia in più alle loro opere. Guido Mocafico è riuscito a renderle vive!
Concordo in pieno!
Le opere dei Blaschka e quelle di Haeckel mi hanno fatto ricordare e gli anni di zoologia all’università e le letture di Lovecraft al lume di candela: una perfetta rappresentazione dei tremendi Antichi oltre le Montagne della Follia, o dei Mi-Go nascosti nelle foreste del Vermont!
Bellissimo articolo! Grazie! ?
Per motivi di passione/lavoro io ci ho trovato anche un punto di collegamento “D”. Sono andato a curiosare il sito ufficiale del fotografo Guido Mocafico e mi è piaciuto molto, si vede che c’è un’attenzione stilistica insolita.
E allora il mio punto D, nonché nuovo punto di riferimento, è diventato Raymond Ford, il creativo che ha curato la creazione del sito web. E questo (mi sa) è solo l’inizio dell’alfabeto!
Grazie ancora ?
Abbiamo lanciato la prima catena di Sant’Antonio davvero positiva? 😀
😀 Esatto, dalla A al Sant’Antonio! Ci può bastare.
Che meraviglia <3
È strano che io veda questo post proprio ora (ti seguo da anni, commento mooolto sporadicamente e soprattutto raccolgo vari post e li leggo tutti assieme quando ho tempo 🙂 ) perché proprio ultimamente ho fatto alcune foto che, secondo me, ricordano in qualche modo quelle di Mocafico…no, non lo conoscevo prima di oggi e no, non mi sto spammando 😀 mi ci sono solo rivista e le sento molto affini 🙂
Complimenti per le foto, Giulia, molto suggestive.
Magari gli spam fossero tutti così! 🙂
oddio, non avevo riflettuto sul fatto che effettivamente si arriva facilmente al mio profilo…adesso mi sento una spammatrice seriale T_T